
Bombay High Court's Goa bench on 2 October rebuked the Election Commission over the process of removing names from voter lists and rejecting Form 8 during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The court said the electoral system must be governed by law, not software, and that the EC's primary goal is to ensure citizens vote. The case involves six members of a family in Santa Cruz constituency who shifted homes within the same area and filed Form 8 for address change, but their names were deleted during SIR.

The EC's automated software rejects Form 8 if the applicant does not submit a pre-filled survey form for the old address. The court questioned how those no longer at the old address could submit such a form. The bench, comprising Justices Valmiki Menezes and Amit S. Jamsandekar, called the SIR process disturbing and said voters must be given a hearing before name removal. The next hearing is set for 5 October.
TV9 Hindi and Bhaskar both report the same core rebuke by the Bombay High Court. TV9 leads with the court's broad principle that law, not software, should run the system, and includes strong criticism by Congress, RJD and CPI leaders, framing the issue as a political attack on the EC. Bhaskar stays closer to the courtroom exchange, detailing the EC's legal arguments, including its reliance on Supreme Court precedents and the voter's own responsibility to update addresses. The common ground is the court's intervention on software-driven rejections. The next hearing on 5 October will test whether the EC's software flexibility meets the court's demand for individual case consideration.
Coverage: 2 sources, 1 government-critical, 1 neutral
Sources (2): tv9hindi.com (government critical), bhaskar.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.