Bombay HC discharges Rahul Raj Singh in Pratyusha Banerjee suicide case

The Story in Brief

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday (30 September) discharged actor-producer Rahul Raj Singh, accused of abetting the suicide of television actor Pratyusha Banerjee in 2016. Justice Shivkumar G Dige relied on the couple's final recorded telephone conversation, which showed Singh trying to dissuade Banerjee from taking any drastic step, The Times of India, NDTV, India TV, Times Now, News9, Hindustan Times and Lawbeat report. Singh's lawyers argued that the FIR was filed in haste without a suicide note and that allowing a trial would be an abuse of process.

Bombay high court discharges Rahul Raj Singh in Pratyusha Banerjee case

Banerjee, best known for playing Anandi in the serial Balika Vadhu, died by suicide on 1 April 2016 at her Mumbai flat. Her parents alleged physical, mental and financial harassment, leading to an FIR under sections 306, 323 and 506 of the IPC. The Dindoshi sessions court had rejected Singh's discharge plea in August 2023, after police filed a chargesheet in 2018. Singh, who was granted anticipatory bail in July 2016, then challenged the order in the high court.

Update, 3 October 2026: Lawbeat reports the Bombay High Court's detailed legal reasoning, noting that Justice Dige found no case for abetment and that the defence argued the sessions judge erred. Lawbeat also cites legal experts on the standard for abetment, quoting veteran counsel Shrikant Bhat that evidence must show active instigation. The other new sources confirm the discharge but add no fresh facts.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Most outlets report the discharge as a straight fact, attributing the court's reasoning to the last recorded conversation. The Times of India and Lawbeat provide the most legal detail, including the Supreme Court standard on abetment, while News9 and Hindustan Times foreground Singh's claims that Banerjee was distressed by her parents and that the couple planned to marry. M9's headline uses dramatic language, a contrast to the uniform neutral tone elsewhere. Times Now's exclusive interview lets Singh describe the decade as 'the darkest phase' of his life. No source questions the court's finding, the coverage is broadly uniform with no significant critical framing. The detailed judgment is awaited.

Coverage: 11 sources, 10 neutral, 1 sensationalist


Sources (11): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), ndtv.com (neutral report), indiatvnews.com (neutral report), timesnownews.com (neutral report), news9live.com (neutral report), timesnownews.com (2) (neutral report), m9.news (sensationalist), odishabytes.com (neutral report), indianexpress.com (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report), lawbeat.in (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 11 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.