
Former judicial officer Giribala Singh on Monday argued before the Madhya Pradesh High Court that calling her daughter-in-law Twisha Sharma a murderer over an abortion was a heat-of-the-moment remark and did not amount to abetment to suicide. Her counsel told Justice Ajay Kumar Nirankari that Singh apologised later and that the chats indicate Samarth Singh’s behaviour, not his mother's, may have driven Sharma to die by suicide on May 12 at her Bhopal matrimonial home.

Singh's counsel argued there is ‘not a shred of evidence’ of instigation, that Sharma had options including a job offer in Delhi, and that both post-mortem reports indicate suicide. The CBI has charge-sheeted Singh and Samarth under Sections 85 (cruelty) and 108 (abetment to suicide) of the BNS. Arguments in the bail plea concluded on Monday, the Supreme Court has stayed the trial but allowed the bail hearing to proceed.
barandbench.com's neutral-report framing led with the specific 'heat of the moment' argument and detailed the exchange in court, while lawbeat.in's neutral-report account emphasized the 'not a shred of evidence' claim and the lack of a dowry death charge. Both outlets covered the same hearing extensively, differing only in which lines from the counsel's arguments they foregrounded, neither adopted a critical or pro-government stance. The uniform coverage reflects the hearing being a bail argument where the court heard only the defence, leaving the prosecution's response and the final decision as the next concrete steps.
Coverage: 3 sources, 3 neutral
Sources (3): barandbench.com (neutral report), lawbeat.in (neutral report), news18.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 3 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.