
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a chargesheet in the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak case, alleging that three subject experts from the National Testing Agency (NTA) exploited security lapses to…
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a chargesheet in the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak case, alleging that three subject experts from the National Testing Agency (NTA) exploited security lapses to leak exam questions for money. The accused are P V Kulkarni (chemistry), Manisha Gurunath Mandhare (zoology and botany), and Manisha Sanjay Havaldar (physics). The CBI says they breached confidentiality, conducted illegal coaching, and reconstructed questions from memory after leaving NTA's Okhla office. The agency used data from the Mygate access-control app at Kulkarni's Pune housing society, WhatsApp chats, and call records to trace the leak. A beautician, Manisha Waghmare, allegedly planted students in the classes and sold the papers through middlemen. The leaked material matched up to 85% of the final exam sets, the CBI found.

The CBI has invoked charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including criminal breach of trust, which carries life imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 1 crore. The agency flagged multiple lapses at NTA's confidential wing: no frisking of experts, no live CCTV monitoring, and a lack of compartmentalisation that allowed the same experts to handle paper setting, translation, and back-translation. The NTA cancelled the 3 May exam and re-conducted it on 21 June. Education minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned after the leak.

The CBI's chargesheet exposes a scandal that combines breathtaking greed with stunning amateurishness. The narrative that the NTA is simply a victim of clever criminals does not hold when security involved unlocked rooms and unlocked memories. The government gave one agency the power to hold India's most competitive exam and then cut corners on every safeguard. Citizens must now force a clean answer: who appointed these experts, who designed the laughable protocols, and why did no one notice that a beautician was running a question paper syndicate out of a residential society? The Public Examinations Act is only as good as the prosecution that follows.
Sources (4): livemint.com, timesnownews.com, timesofindia.indiatimes.com, siasat.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.