
Disability rights organisations have condemned the proposed nine-category disability enumeration framework for Census 2027, saying it legally fails to capture the 21 distinct disabilities recognised under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. The National Platform for Rights of Disabled, backed by 405 signatories, warned this will produce inaccurate data and render entire groups of disabled persons invisible in official statistics.

The groups noted that Census 2027 will record disability under nine headings: seeing, hearing, speech, mobility, intellectual disability, mental illness, acid attack, chronic neurological disease, and blood disorder. They argue this excludes conditions such as autism, specific learning disabilities, dwarfism, leprosy-cured persons, and multiple disabilities including deafblindness, while lumping cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease into broader categories. Three distinct blood disorders, thalassemia, haemophilia, and sickle-cell disease, are reduced to one category.
The second phase of Census 2027 enumeration began on August 17 in snow-bound areas, with door-to-door counting across the rest of India scheduled from September 1 to September 30, 2026.
Census data on disability shapes access to Rs 9,000 crore in central schemes, including reservation in government jobs and education under the RPwD Act. When broad categories collapse distinct conditions like autism or thalassemia, governments can argue that no data exists to enforce specific quotas. The last Census counted only 2.68 crore disabled persons, far below National Sample Survey estimates of 4-8 crore. The Office of the Registrar General, which decides the questionnaire, has not publicly explained why nine categories suffice. The 21 disabilities are not new, they have been law since 2016. Watch for the Census Commissioner’s reply, due before the next draft questionnaire is published, likely in 2026.
Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Methodology and corrections.