
The Enforcement Directorate conducted searches at 13 premises across Tripura, West Bengal and Maharashtra on 4 November 2026 in a money-laundering probe linked to an alleged Rs 15 crore tender fraud. The case stems from a complaint by Nagpur-based SK Sales Corporation, which says it deposited about Rs 14.55 crore as earnest money deposits between September 2024 and February 2025 against government tenders for midday meal and power sector projects that were never issued by the Tripura government.
Suspended IAS officer Abhishek Chandra of the Tripura cadre has been named in the investigation. The ED alleges that Chandra projected himself as a bureaucrat controlling tender processes and introduced the complainant to Utpal Kumar Chowdhury, whose private proprietorship ‘Directorate of Higher Education’ collected the money under a name resembling an actual government department. The funds were allegedly routed through shell companies, some registered in names of domestic workers, and used to buy flats and a residential property in Mumbai's Shivaji Park area in the names of Chandra's family members.
The ED has linked this case to an earlier investigation (ECIR/AGSZO/03/2025) involving five FIRs in West Bengal and Tripura, where a similar modus operandi allegedly cheated multiple victims of over Rs 44 crore. Two provisional attachment orders were issued in that case on 22 January 2026 and 31 July 2026. The agency seized documents, digital devices and evidence of hawala transactions during the searches.
The Times of India leads with the fraud amount of Rs 15 crore and the ED crackdown, while Inventiva leads with the search action and reports the amount as about Rs 14.55 crore, a minor factual discrepancy that both outlets attribute to the same ED press release. Inventiva provides more detail on the earlier investigation, including the dates of two attachment orders and the August 2025 searches, giving a fuller timeline of the case. The Times of India emphasises the use of shell companies and property purchases in Mumbai. Both outlets present the ED's allegations without comment, and neither includes a response from the accused. The coverage is uniform straight reporting, with Inventiva offering more chronological context.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), inventiva.co.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.