Supreme Court says legislators cannot override party directives despite majority support

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskIndia1 month ago6 Views

Having majority no reason for lawmakers to defy party: Supreme Court

Justice Joymalya Bagchi, sitting on a three judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, said on Wednesday that a party's official directives bind its elected legislators even when those…

Justice Joymalya Bagchi, sitting on a three judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, said on Wednesday that a party's official directives bind its elected legislators even when those legislators hold a majority, The Hindu reported. The remark came during arguments in the long running dispute over which faction, one led by Uddhav Thackeray and the other by Eknath Shinde, is the real Shiv Sena and holds its election symbol. Shinde split from Thackeray with 40 of the party's 55 MLAs, brought down the Thackeray government and formed a new one with the BJP's Devendra Fadnavis, a move the Election Commission later endorsed by recognising his faction as the genuine Shiv Sena. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Thackeray, argued the Tenth Schedule recognises no majority within a legislature party and cited a 2023 Constitution Bench ruling in the Subhash Desai case to say the political party and its legislature wing remain distinct concepts. No written judgment has been delivered.

Supreme Court Examines Whip in Shiv Sena Faction Dispute

Indian Opinion Analysis

Bagchi's remark came during oral argument, not in a signed order, so it shows the bench's thinking without yet deciding the case. The Hindu's report carries Sibal's argument at length but does not include how Shinde's side or the Election Commission answered this specific point, leaving only one side of the exchange on record. Sibal's own framing, that letting a legislature majority govern would let any group of defectors topple a government, is an advocate's argument for his client, not a finding the court has made. The written judgment the bench eventually issues will show whether it adopts Bagchi's oral view or reaches the case on different grounds.


Source: www.thehindu.com

This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.