
Hyderabad police have defended their decision not to arrest Lingamaneni Sanjush, son of Jana Sena MP Lingamaneni Ramesh, after his Aston Martin fatally hit 26-year-old Bharati Mukhi near Inorbit Mall on August 16. The Times of India reports police cited legal provisions under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Supreme Court's Arnesh Kumar guidelines, saying no circumstances warranting arrest were found after initial drug and alcohol tests returned negative. The Rs 6 crore car has been seized and sent for motor vehicle inspection.

The MP issued a statement saying his son immediately took the injured woman to Apollo Hospital and later reported to police. He urged the public not to speculate. However, Hindustan Times notes police confirmed that after taking the victim to hospital, Sanjush went home and was later brought to the station by an investigating officer. Police commissioner M Ramesh denied any preferential treatment, saying no calls were received to influence the case.
A case has been registered under section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which carries a maximum of five years in prison. Police say further action, including possible arrest, will depend on the motor vehicle inspector report and forensic findings. The woman's family has been offered support by the MP.
Coverage across all sources is essentially straight reporting with no discernible slant, though each outlet emphasises different aspects of the police response. Times of India leads with the legal justification for non-arrest, presenting the police defence prominently, while Hindustan Times leads with the MP's statement and includes the detail that Sanjush went home after the hospital. This difference in sequence changes tone slightly: the former frames the story around due process, the latter around the sequence of events. No source challenges the police account or presents an opposition view, and none sensationalises the luxury car beyond noting its value. The measured read: the investigation is in early stages, and the key pending evidence is the motor vehicle inspector report and forensic analysis, which will determine whether an arrest follows.
Coverage: 4 sources, 4 neutral
Sources (4): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (2) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (3) (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.