
Corrected 1 October 2026: source list (India Today video pages removed; they are not articles).
Parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode began an indefinite hunger strike at Azad Maidan in Mumbai on Monday, 28 September, demanding the arrest of Professor Suryanarayana Doolla, who is named in an FIR alleging caste discrimination and abetment to suicide. The family, who had paused their protest over the weekend due to Ganpati visarjan, said the institute’s 10-member inquiry committee has not contacted them. A medical team checked their vital signs at the protest site, and Congress MP Varsha Gaikwad visited them.

The Mumbai Police Crime Branch has recorded statements of more than 25 people. A female friend told police that Wakode, in his last call, expressed regret over being caught cheating in his thermodynamics paper. Wakode’s iPhone has been sent to the Kalina Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis. Police may seek Apple’s help to unlock the device. The 10-member committee, initially given a week, has been granted a one-week extension to complete its probe. Students have demanded its reconstitution, alleging some members supported Doolla.
Coverage across outlets is largely uniform, reporting the same core facts: the parents’ hunger strike, the probe panel’s extension, and the police disclosure that Wakode told a friend he regretted cheating. The Times of India and Deccan Herald lead with the parents’ demand for Doolla’s arrest, while NDTV and New Indian Express highlight the father’s defiance. India Today and The Tribune focus on the police reconstruction and the friend’s statement. The Hindu adds the family’s criticism of the leak of CCTV footage. No outlet frames the story as pro-government or critical of the government, all maintain a neutral, event-driven tone. The key difference lies in which element each outlet leads with, the parents’ action, the police investigation, or the committee’s extension.
Police have not yet recorded Doolla’s statement, and the crime branch has found no material corroborating the family’s allegation of months-long harassment by him.
Corrected 1 October 2026: source list (India Today video pages removed; they are not articles).
Coverage: 16 sources, 16 neutral
Sources (16): thehindu.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), newindianexpress.com (neutral report), newindianexpress.com (2) (neutral report), ndtv.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (2) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (3) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (4) (neutral report), tribuneindia.com (neutral report), indiatoday.in (neutral report), economictimes.indiatimes.com (neutral report), deccanherald.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (5) (neutral report), thehindu.com (2) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (6) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (7) (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 16 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
Update, 30 September 2026: this story now draws on 16 sources.