
A new analysis by the Lowy Institute argues that India's commitment to 'principled' positions in foreign policy, such as non-interference and strategic autonomy, has become a liability. The report says this approach…
A new analysis by the Lowy Institute argues that India's commitment to 'principled' positions in foreign policy, such as non-interference and strategic autonomy, has become a liability. The report says this approach leaves New Delhi unable to respond flexibly to crises like the war in Ukraine or instability in Myanmar.

India's refusal to condemn Russia's invasion, despite its strategic partnership with the US, is cited as an example. The institute claims this stance damages India's credibility as a rising power and limits its influence in global forums.
The analysis concludes that India must choose between remaining ideologically consistent or adopting a more pragmatic, interest-driven foreign policy to achieve its ambitions on the world stage.
The Lowy Institute, an Australian think tank, has long tracked India's rise, and its critique reflects a persistent debate within strategic circles. India's 'principled' stance, rooted in its non-aligned past, often contrasts with the transactional diplomacy of major powers. For a nation seeking a permanent UN Security Council seat, this rigidity can frustrate allies who expect reciprocity. The real test will be India's response to the next major crisis where its strategic and principled interests clash. Watch for New Delhi's handling of the Quad and its energy dependence on Russia as key indicators of any shift.
Source: lowyinstitute.org
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.