
Livemint.com reports that a financial planner argues parents should invest not to fund a specific career but to give children the freedom to choose their own path. The article cites the writer's…
Livemint.com reports that a financial planner argues parents should invest not to fund a specific career but to give children the freedom to choose their own path. The article cites the writer's own children: a daughter who chose industrial design and a son obsessed with football whose future is uncertain. It notes that many jobs of the future do not yet exist. Long-term systematic investment plans (SIPs) are recommended not as a route to a predetermined outcome but as a way to ensure money never limits a child's options.
The column's 'fund the child, not the career' narrative is refreshing but risks implying that financial freedom alone guarantees a happy outcome. Many well-funded children still struggle with direction. The real test is whether parents can also teach resilience and self-knowledge alongside saving. The next time a planner sells you a 'child dream' SIP, ask: what if the dream changes five times before college?
Source: livemint.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.