
The Kerala High Court refused to suspend Martin Antony’s sentence in the 2017 actor assault case. The Division Bench said there was prima facie evidence that he aided the crime and joined…
The Kerala High Court refused to suspend Martin Antony’s sentence in the 2017 actor assault case. The Division Bench said there was prima facie evidence that he aided the crime and joined the conspiracy. It referred to call records showing contact with N.S. Sunil, also known as Pulsar, and a message sent shortly before an alleged staged accident that stopped the survivor’s car.
Antony denied the prosecution’s case and said he was neither a passenger, driver nor witness in the car. He said he had spent over five years in prison and had served his sentence since December 2025. A Sessions Court convicted six of the ten accused in 2025.
The order keeps Antony’s sentence in force, but a prima facie finding is not a final appellate verdict. Public discussion should avoid treating allegations or serious charges as settled facts. Antony’s challenge to the evidence remains relevant. Readers should distinguish between the reasons given for refusing suspension and issues that may still be examined in further legal proceedings.
Source: thehindu.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.