Madras HC warns CM Vijay, Minister Arjuna with Rs 50,000 cost

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance2 minutes ago1 Views

The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay and Public Works Minister Aadhav Arjuna that it could impose an exemplary cost of Rs 50,000 each if…

The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay and Public Works Minister Aadhav Arjuna that it could impose an exemplary cost of Rs 50,000 each if they sought further adjournments to file applications seeking rejection of election petitions challenging their 2026 Assembly election victories.

Madras HC warns CM Vijay, Minister Arjuna with Rs 50,000 cost

Justice V Lakshminarayanan orally remarked, "I'm not bothered about the personalities," and noted that election petitions must be disposed of within six months. Counsel for the leaders said applications were ready but signatures were delayed due to the ongoing Assembly session. The court adjourned the matter to August 27 after counsel assured the applications would be filed in a day.

The election petitions, filed by DMK candidates and voters, allege that Vijay appealed to children in a campaign speech to influence their parents' votes, violating election rules, and that his financial affidavit had defects. Two petitions also challenge Arjuna's victory from Villivakkam.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The court's warning comes as the six-month statutory deadline for disposing of election petitions, under Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, looms. The High Court admitted these petitions in July, meaning a decision is expected by January 2027. The key allegation, that Vijay involved minors in campaigning, draws on a strict Election Commission prohibition under the Model Code of Conduct. If the petitions are not rejected at this threshold stage, the court will proceed to a full trial, examining evidence from the April 21 campaign speech. The next hearing on August 27 will show whether the leaders' applications are accepted or the court proceeds to examine the petitions' merits.


Source: thenewsminute.com

This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.