Metro 7A design flaw may waste Rs 260 crore in rebuild

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance44 minutes ago3 Views

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) may have to dismantle and rebuild a section of the Metro 7A elevated viaduct because its general consultant failed to account for airport height restrictions,…

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) may have to dismantle and rebuild a section of the Metro 7A elevated viaduct because its general consultant failed to account for airport height restrictions, putting over Rs 260 crore of public funds at risk, sources told the Times of India.

Metro 7A design flaw may waste Rs 260 crore in rebuild

The error lies in the design of overhead electrical equipment needed to run the line. The consultant consortium SYSTRA-CEG-SMCIPL reportedly did not incorporate the additional clearance required by the Airports Authority of India, which ranges from 2.5 cm to 2.4 m along the 3.4 km stretch linking Dahisar to Terminal 2 of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The project is already 71 per cent complete, with the Airport Colony station 82 per cent ready.

SYSTRA did not respond to requests for comment. MMRDA must now decide whether to rebuild the affected structure or seek damages from the consultant.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) relies on general consultants for design coordination on metro projects. In 2023, the Bombay High Court flagged similar design coordination failures on Metro 3, attributing cost overruns to consultant lapses. Under MMRDA's standard contract terms, cost recovery from the consultant consortium is possible if negligence is proven, though such recovery typically takes years of arbitration. The Airport Authority of India (AAI) sets vertical clearance limits near airports under the Aircraft Act, 1934, any structure exceeding those limits requires revised approval, which resets timelines. The Rs 260 crore at risk represents structural work already completed that must be demolished and rebuilt. MMRDA's board will now decide whether to seek damages from SYSTRA-CEG-SMCIPL or absorb the loss from its project contingency fund.


Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com

This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.