Bombay HC stays Sachin Waze bail in Antilia bomb scare case

The Story in Brief

The Bombay High Court on 30 September stayed the bail granted to former police officer Sachin Waze in the 2021 Antilia bomb scare and Mansukh Hiran murder case, Bar and Bench, Hindustan Times, Times of India, Indian Express and others reported. A division bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale granted an ad-interim stay after the National Investigation Agency (NIA) appealed, arguing the special court's order was 'erroneous and illegal'. The court issued notice to Waze and listed the matter for 7 October.

NIA court grants bail to Sachin Waze in Antilia bomb scare case

The stay came after two earlier benches recused themselves. A bench of Justices Sarang Kotwal and RR Bhonsale recused on 29 September, followed by Justices Bharati Dangre and Ashish Chavan on 30 September. Waze, who has spent 1,999 days in custody, remains in Thane Central Prison as bail formalities were incomplete when the stay was issued.

On 29 September, special judge Chakor S Baviskar had granted Waze bail on a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh, ruling the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of terrorism under the UAPA. The court noted that the Ambani family's day-to-day business was not disturbed and that gelatin sticks lacked detonators. The NIA argued that the special court ignored the rigours of UAPA Section 43 D and that Waze's role was 'central' to the terror crime.

Update, 2 October 2026: The Bombay High Court on 30 September stayed the bail granted to Sachin Waze by a special NIA court, Bar and Bench, Hindustan Times and Times of India reported. A bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale granted an ad-interim stay and listed the NIA's appeal for 7 October. Two earlier benches had recused themselves.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The coverage shows a clear divide between the special court's critical assessment of the NIA probe and the agency's urgent defence of its case. Pro-government framings, such as those in India TV and Times Now, focus on the NIA's argument that Waze intended to create terror and that the special court erred, while government-critical outlets like Live Law and Siasat highlight the judge's sharp observations about the NIA waiting for a 'Shubh Muhurat' to record statements. The Hindu and Deccan Herald provide neutral, detailed reporting of the recusal and stay. The NIA's appeal argues the special court ignored UAPA's bail restrictions, while the court's order found no evidence the Ambanis were terrorised. The high court will hear both sides on 7 October.

Coverage: 25 sources, 2 government-critical, 23 neutral


Sources (25): hindustantimes.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), thefederal.com (neutral report), indiatvnews.com (neutral report), deccanherald.com (neutral report), siasat.com (government critical), livelaw.in (government critical), timesnownews.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (2) (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (2) (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report), indiatvnews.com (2) (neutral report), deccanherald.com (2) (neutral report), barandbench.com (neutral report), rediff.com (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (2) (neutral report), nationalheraldindia.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (3) (neutral report), verdictum.in (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (3) (neutral report), indianexpress.com (neutral report), freepressjournal.in (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (4) (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (4) (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 25 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.