Judges are not gods, won’t get every judgment right: Justice Karol

Retiring Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol said in his farewell address that judges are not gods and will not get every judgment right, stressing the need for humility and the importance…

Retiring Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol said in his farewell address that judges are not gods and will not get every judgment right, stressing the need for humility and the importance of seeing the person behind every litigant. The ceremonial bench, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, paid tribute to Justice Karol on his last working day, with lawyers remembering him as a 'saintly judge' who encouraged young advocates.

Outgoing SC judge says judges are not gods, will not always be right

Chief Justice Surya Kant praised Justice Karol for his patience, courtesy, and willingness to listen, noting that his judgments gave legal visibility to overlooked realities, such as recognising homemakers as 'nation builders' and directing compensation for loss of domestic care. Justice Karol reflected on his nearly four-decade legal career, saying the courtroom was a vehicle for something greater than himself, and emphasised that the true meaning of constitutionalism lies in 'dharma' as duty.

Justice Karol urged lawyers to 'live the Constitution, don't cite it' and said the Supreme Court's importance lies in giving ordinary citizens the belief that someone will listen. He also acknowledged those who cannot access justice because it is too distant or expensive. The judge concluded with gratitude for having served the Constitution and the people.

Indian Opinion Analysis

All four sources provide near-identical straight reportage of Justice Karol's farewell, quoting the same key lines about judges not being gods, humility, and seeing the person behind the litigant. The coverage is uniformly respectful, with no criticism or framing differences. Rediff.com and LiveLaw focus on his 'not gods' remark, while Hindustan Times and Barandbench emphasise his encouragement of young lawyers and the CJI's tribute. The measured takeaway is a rare moment of institutional consensus: the judiciary's own narrative of fallibility and humanity is reported without contest. What to watch: whether this self-reflection influences judicial appointments or public trust metrics.

Coverage: 4 sources, 4 neutral


Sources (4): rediff.com (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report), livelaw.in (neutral report), barandbench.com (neutral report)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.