
Shanker Singham, President of the Competere Foundation, has said that India's partial opening of foreign direct investment (FDI) in e-commerce may be more harmful than a complete ban. In July 2025, the…
Shanker Singham, President of the Competere Foundation, has said that India's partial opening of foreign direct investment (FDI) in e-commerce may be more harmful than a complete ban. In July 2025, the government allowed FDI in inventory-based e-commerce firms, but only for exports. Singham argued that this policy picks winners by favouring one business model over others, distorting competition.

A report by the Centre for Trade and Investment Law and the Competere Foundation estimates that India's anti-competitive market distortions could cost the economy $173.6 billion over five years, or about 4.2% of GDP. Of this, $127.2 billion is attributed to foreign investment restrictions. Singham said the government should balance national security concerns against the cost of lost competition.
The government's July 2025 FDI relaxation is a narrow carve-out: it only permits foreign-owned inventory for export, not for domestic sales. This keeps the core marketplace model, used by Amazon and Flipkart, still subject to FDI bans. The $173.6 billion loss estimate, though contested, signals the scale of the debate. The real question is whether the government will next open domestic inventory-based e-commerce to FDI, which would directly affect existing players and India's retail sector. Watch for the next trade policy review or a finance ministry discussion paper on e-commerce FDI.
Source: thehindu.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.