
A New Indian Express Quick Take, in the paper's editorial section, picked up a study of LinkedIn profile edits. The piece said researchers from fields such as organisational psychology and labour history…
A New Indian Express Quick Take, in the paper's editorial section, picked up a study of LinkedIn profile edits. The piece said researchers from fields such as organisational psychology and labour history are increasingly mining the professional networking site for data, and singled out a paper titled 'Time travel on professional profiles', written by a team led by Stanford University economist Nicholas Bloom. It shows, the piece said, that a fifth of US LinkedIn users went back to revise their past employment histories. The Quick Take called that natural enough, since users highlight skills reflecting job market mutations, and said the interesting part is the sharp difference in retroactive edits after 2022, when users started using AI chatbots. It closed on one subject it says is screaming for more attention in labour economics research: the skills job seekers are highlighting as automation increases.

The Quick Take is a short editorial comment rather than a report of the study, and it carries a single figure from the paper: a fifth of US LinkedIn users going back to revise their past employment histories. It sets the sharp post-2022 difference in retroactive edits alongside the point at which users started using AI chatbots, and offers the ordinary explanation for revision in general, that people highlight skills reflecting job market mutations. Its scope is US LinkedIn users, and the site's growing use as a data source for organisational psychology and labour history researchers. Bloom's paper, 'Time travel on professional profiles', holds the underlying figures, and the Quick Take names the next question for the field: the skills job seekers are highlighting as automation increases.
Source: www.newindianexpress.com
This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.