
Artificial intelligence can analyse data, create presentations and assist with coding, but it cannot replace human judgement, empathy, leadership, trust, creativity or curiosity, Hindustan Times reports. The education debate should therefore move…
Artificial intelligence can analyse data, create presentations and assist with coding, but it cannot replace human judgement, empathy, leadership, trust, creativity or curiosity, Hindustan Times reports. The education debate should therefore move beyond whether students use AI and focus on whether it supports or substitutes their thinking.
The article points to Norway’s plan to restrict generative AI for primary school students while introducing it gradually to older pupils under teacher supervision. It calls for schools to build independent thinking, communication, problem-solving and resilience through discussions, debates, collaborative projects and creative exercises. Parents and policymakers, it says, should teach responsible and ethical AI use rather than simply oppose the technology.
The lazy narrative that AI will make schools irrelevant ignores what machines cannot provide. But the opposite claim, that traditional teaching alone will prepare children, is also weak. Students need both strong foundations and guided practice with new tools. Norway’s age-based approach offers one test, but India will need evidence from classrooms: do AI-assisted students reason better independently, or merely produce faster answers? That result should guide policy.
Source: hindustantimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.