
The Supreme Court on August 10 upheld the acquittal of 20 persons in a murder case, ruling that identical eyewitness accounts bore "the imprint of tutoring." The bench found that the witnesses…
The Supreme Court on August 10 upheld the acquittal of 20 persons in a murder case, ruling that identical eyewitness accounts bore "the imprint of tutoring." The bench found that the witnesses had given strikingly similar statements, casting doubt on their credibility. The court's observation came while dismissing an appeal against a high court order that had set aside the conviction.
The apex court noted that while the occurrence was not in doubt, the evidence had been manufactured to fit a narrative. The judgment reinforces the principle that mechanical acceptance of multiple identical testimonies can result in a miscarriage of justice.
Some will cry that the court let murderers go free, but that misses the point. The bench did not doubt the crime; it doubted witnesses who parroted identical accounts. That takes courage. In a system where eyewitnesses are routinely coached to get convictions, this judgment says process matters. The real test is whether trial courts now start weeding out too-perfect testimony or go back to business as usual.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.