CBI chargesheet names three NTA experts in NEET leak

‘FIFA’ group, small chits: How 3 NTA experts at centre of NEET leak probe ‘abused’ positions

The CBI's chargesheet in the NEET-UG paper leak has named three Pune-based NTA subject experts as the primary sources. Manisha Mandhare (biology) marked leaked questions in students' textbooks and used a WhatsApp…

The Story in Brief

The CBI's chargesheet in the NEET-UG paper leak has named three Pune-based NTA subject experts as the primary sources. Manisha Mandhare (biology) marked leaked questions in students' textbooks and used a WhatsApp group called 'Fifa world cup 2026' for coordination. PV Kulkarni (chemistry) smuggled all 135 chemistry questions out of the NTA facility on small paper chits. Manisha Havaldar (physics) memorised 68 questions and accepted Rs 25,000 and a box of mangoes in exchange.

Three NTA experts used chits, WhatsApp group to leak NEET paper

The NTA violated its own protocols by reusing all three experts across multiple stages of paper preparation and allowing them to see all four master question sets. The chargesheet names 13 accused but states no evidence has been found against any government official or NTA office-bearer. The NEET-UG exam, held on May 3 for over 22 lakh students, was cancelled on May 12, and a re-exam was conducted on June 21.

Three NTA experts used chits, WhatsApp group to leak NEET paper

The Indian Opinion

Many narratives paint the NEET leak as either a lone criminal act or a damning indictment of the entire system. The CBI chargesheet shows a more nuanced truth: three experts exploited NTA's own procedural lapses, reusing the same people across every stage, no frisking in the confidential wing. This is a specific institutional failure, not just a few bad apples. The real test is whether the government will now enforce the security upgrades that the NTA's own audit likely recommended, or let this become another forgotten scandal.


Sources (2): hindustantimes.com, thehindu.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.