
The tribal affairs ministry has refused to disclose information on a claimed Manipur government proposal to delete 'Any Kuki Tribes' from the Scheduled Tribes list, citing potential to aggravate inter-community tensions in the ethnic violence-hit state. Information Commissioner Ashutosh Chaturvedi upheld the ministry's stand on 13 November.

RTI applicant Michael Haokip referred to a Manipur government letter of 25 July 2024, seeking confirmation of receipt, file number, action taken and copies of communications. The ministry's 24 June 2025 reply said disclosure could exert 'undue pressure' and cited past instances of violence following such disclosures.
The CIC ruled that public interest in disclosure did not outweigh potential harm, and rejected even redacted copies under Section 10 of the RTI Act.
All four outlets carried identical PTI copy, uniformly reporting the ministry's refusal and the CIC's backing, with no independent framing or editorial slant. The coverage leads with the ministry's stated reason for withholding information, repeating its claim that disclosure could disturb public peace, and gives the applicant's counter-argument that the response was vague and speculative. The net effect is a balanced presentation of both sides. The story hinges on the public-interest test the CIC applied, which it decided in favour of the ministry. A fuller picture would require knowing whether the Manipur proposal actually exists and what the RTI applicant may seek next.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): PTI (carried by theprint.in, newindianexpress.com, thehindu.com), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.