
Four women wrestlers have moved a Delhi sessions court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case. The criminal revision petition, filed through senior advocate Rebecca John, argues that the trial court's August 3 order is 'unsustainable in law' and based on 'archaic and stereotypical assumptions' about how victims of sexual assault should behave. Special Judge Dig Vinay Singh is scheduled to hear the matter on 26 September.
The trial court had acquitted Singh, a former BJP MP, and Tomar, saying the allegations were 'false and fabricated' and part of a politically motivated conspiracy. It cited the complainants' prolonged silence, continued cordial relations with the accused, and contradictions in testimony as creating reasonable doubt. The wrestlers contend the court failed to consider that women facing workplace harassment may remain silent to protect their careers. The appeal now awaits hearing before the sessions court.
The coverage is uniform in reporting the wrestlers' appeal and the hearing scheduled for 26 September. All outlets recount the same key elements: the challenge to the August 3 acquittal, the arguments about 'archaic and stereotypical assumptions,' and the next hearing date. No source adopts a distinct editorial stance, each presents the appeal as a straight news development. The only variation is in the level of detail about the trial court's reasoning, with Hindustan Times and Mathrubhumi providing more extensive summaries of the magistrate's findings. The legal process now moves to the sessions court, with the next hearing set for 26 September.
Coverage: 9 sources, 9 neutral
Sources (9): livelaw.in (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report), timesnownews.com (neutral report), mathrubhumi.com (neutral report), abplive.com (neutral report), freepressjournal.in (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (2) (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 9 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
Update, 30 September 2026: this story now draws on 9 sources.