
The Awami Ittihad Party (AIP) has appealed to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to grant bail to party president and Baramulla MP Er Rashid, who has been incarcerated for seven years.…
The Awami Ittihad Party (AIP) has appealed to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to grant bail to party president and Baramulla MP Er Rashid, who has been incarcerated for seven years. AIP chief spokesperson Inam Un Nabi told a press conference in Srinagar on Saturday that the MP's prolonged detention without trial violates the constitutional principle that 'bail is the rule and jail is the exception.' He urged the CJI to consider the case with compassion and urgency, noting that seven years of parliamentary representation and public service cannot be recovered.
In a significant development, co-accused Yasin Malik has submitted an affidavit in a Delhi court stating that the investigating agency wrongly identified Er Rashid as 'Sheikh Abdul Rashid' based on an alleged email, claiming that name belongs to another JKLF associate. The court has accepted the affidavit and will consider it during charge-framing arguments. Inam Un Nabi said this strengthens the case for bail, arguing that the evidentiary basis of the allegations has been undermined. He stressed the appeal is constitutional, not political, and called for timely justice.
This case tests India's judicial commitment to the 'bail is rule, jail is exception' principle when an elected MP, representing 40% of Kashmir's voters, has been in custody for seven years without a conviction. The AIP's appeal to the CJI, citing Yasin Malik's affidavit that another man shared the name used in allegations, highlights a possible case of mistaken identity. A fair-minded reader would ask: if the key evidence against Rashid is undermined by the principal accused's statement, does prolonged detention serve justice or merely punishment before trial? The CJI's response will be the real measure.
Source: greaterkashmir.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.