BCI reverses ban on NALSAR 2026 graduates after day of uproar

No NALSAR 2026 graduate to be enrolled as advocate: Bar Council amid CJI invite row

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has withdrawn its blanket ban on enrolling NALSAR University of Law’s 2026 batch as advocates, hours after directing all state bar councils to freeze enrolments. The…

The Story in Brief

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has withdrawn its blanket ban on enrolling NALSAR University of Law’s 2026 batch as advocates, hours after directing all state bar councils to freeze enrolments. The reversal came after BCI members, led by Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, said the “vast majority” of graduating students were “innocent” and not party to any move to show disrespect. The original order, issued on August 13, followed a campaign by some students opposing Chief Justice of India Surya Kant’s invitation as convocation chief guest over his remarks on the Delhi student protests.

BCI blocks NALSAR 2026 batch enrolment amid CJI invite row

BCI has now said all 2026 graduates may seek enrolment with any state bar council. However, it will continue a fact-finding inquiry into the role of “a handful of teachers and outsiders” whom it accuses of instigating students. A final decision is scheduled for August 19 after NALSAR submits a report. BCI Member N. Manoj Kumar had called the initial blanket direction “manifestly arbitrary”, warning it could create an impression that the BCI was appeasing the judiciary.

BCI blocks NALSAR 2026 batch enrolment amid CJI invite row

The Indian Opinion

The BCI’s initial order was an overreach that punished an entire batch for the views of some students. Enrolment cannot be suspended on the basis of group guilt, and the swift reversal proved it. But the affair also exposes a deeper unease: students at a top law school objected to the Chief Justice based on his conduct in a specific case. That is legitimate dissent, not indiscipline. The real test is whether the BCI will now focus on fixing legal education instead of policing opinion. The August 19 report will show if it can distinguish between reasoned criticism and misconduct.


Sources (12): indiatoday.in, deccanchronicle.com, livelaw.in, livelaw.in (2), barandbench.com, ndtvprofit.com, hindustantimes.com, timesofindia.indiatimes.com, timesofindia.indiatimes.com (2), timesnownews.com, timesnownews.com (2), ndtv.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 12 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 12 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.