Calcutta HC asks Bengal on mosque loudspeaker removal action

Has State removed loudspeakers from mosques? Calcutta High Court asks

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday asked the West Bengal government whether it has taken any action to remove loudspeakers from mosques. A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and…

The Story in Brief

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday asked the West Bengal government whether it has taken any action to remove loudspeakers from mosques. A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Atarup Banerjee posed the question during a PIL challenging alleged police instructions to religious establishments to remove loudspeakers.

Calcutta HC asks Bengal on mosque loudspeaker removal action

The PIL, filed by lawyer Danish Farooqui, claims police in Hooghly and other districts gave blanket verbal directions without written orders or decibel measurements. Senior advocate Kalyan Bandyopadhyay said loudspeakers were removed from about 4,000 mosques. The state's advocate general opposed the petition, saying no imam has come forward. The matter will be heard again on August 18.

The Indian Opinion

The Calcutta High Court has rightly asked for facts before acting. The petitioner claims mass removal without notices, but the state counters that no mosque authority has complained. Both sides have points: loudspeaker noise is a real concern for residents, but targeting only mosques without due process would be discriminatory. The real test will be whether the state can produce written records of any action, and whether the petitioner can name a single mosque that was forced to remove loudspeakers. Until then, this remains a clash of assertions.


Sources (2): barandbench.com, thefederal.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.