
In a filing before a US federal court, Capital One set out why it shut more than 300 accounts tied to the Trump Organization, saying the decision followed a months-long review by…
In a filing before a US federal court, Capital One set out why it shut more than 300 accounts tied to the Trump Organization, saying the decision followed a months-long review by its anti-money-laundering team, that notice went out in March 2021, and that it had acted consistently with its own policies and with regulatory guidance. The bank wants a lawsuit brought by the Trump Organization and Eric Trump thrown out, the two allege the closures amounted to politically motivated debanking. A Miami judge had already rejected two earlier complaints while permitting amended filings, and Capital One contends the newest version repeats those same flaws and rests on selectively quoted passages. It added that some transaction patterns matched activities identified in federal banking guidance, while stressing it has not accused the Trump Organization of illegal money laundering.

Everything set out here comes from Capital One's own filing, the Trump Organization and Eric Trump appear only through the debanking allegation the bank is asking the court to dismiss. Both that allegation and the bank's reference to transaction patterns matching federal banking guidance are contested claims awaiting judicial testing rather than findings, and the Miami court has already dismissed two earlier versions of the complaint while allowing amended filings. The court's ruling on this third version of the complaint is the next decision due in the case.
Source: The Times of India
This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.