Centre appoints 30 judges to four high courts

Centre Notifies Appointment Of 8 Advocates As Additional Judges Of Calcutta High Court

The law ministry on Saturday notified the appointment of 30 judges to the high courts of Madras, Calcutta, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh. Of these, 23 are advocates and seven are judicial officers.…

The Story in Brief

The law ministry on Saturday notified the appointment of 30 judges to the high courts of Madras, Calcutta, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh. Of these, 23 are advocates and seven are judicial officers. Eight advocates have been appointed as additional judges of the Calcutta High Court: Aryak Dutt, Atarup Banerjee, Sandip Kumar De, Partha Pratim Roy, Sudip Deb, Anuj Singh, Arjun Ray Mukherjee and Rishad Medora, as reported by LiveLaw. Most appointees serve two-year terms before evaluation for permanent positions.

Centre appoints eight advocates Calcutta High Court additional judges

The Times of India reports that India’s 25 high courts have over 60 lakh pending cases, of which 80,000 have been pending for over 30 years. The law minister has blamed high court collegiums for not following timelines in recommending appointments, leading to large vacancies.

The Indian Opinion

The blame game over judicial vacancies, government accuses collegiums of delay, collegiums cite executive inaction, misses the point. With 341 vacancies against 1,112 sanctioned posts and 80,000 cases stuck for over three decades, neither side looks good. The real test is whether these 30 judges, especially the eight additional ones in Calcutta facing a two-year review, will meaningfully clear the backlog. Numbers alone will not fix a system that takes decades to dispose of a single case.


Sources (2): livelaw.in, timesofindia.indiatimes.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.