
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Friday strongly disapproved of the Bar Council of India's now-revoked decision to block enrolment of NALSAR University of Law's 2026 graduates as advocates after students…
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Friday strongly disapproved of the Bar Council of India's now-revoked decision to block enrolment of NALSAR University of Law's 2026 graduates as advocates after students protested his invitation as convocation chief guest. The Supreme Court said students have a right to protest peacefully and stayed any coercive action against NALSAR students or faculty by the BCI or state Bar Councils. "If students are protesting peacefully, who is BCI to take action? It is a dialogue between students and me. No one else has to step in," the CJI said.

The controversy began after six representations from NALSAR students objected to the invitation, citing the CJI's reported remarks during a hearing on police excesses against protesters during the July 20 march to Parliament. On Thursday, BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra directed state Bar Councils not to enrol NALSAR's 2026 law graduates until further orders, but later retracted. Livemint reports senior lawyers have called for a probe into how the decision originated, and questioned BCI's accountability and Mishra's repeated election as chairman.
The BCI's reflex was to punish students for exercising a constitutional right, a move the CJI rightly called uncalled for. But the louder issue is the regulator's unchecked power, with one chairman for seven terms and no real answerability. Senior lawyers across the spectrum, not just student activists, are asking who pushed this ban. The test now is whether the BCI can act as a regulator, not a disciplinarian. Watch if it opens a transparent inquiry into its own decision or quietly moves on, and whether Parliament takes up legal profession reforms.
Sources (2): timesofindia.indiatimes.com, livemint.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.