
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, 14 October, sought the Centre's response to a public interest litigation challenging the government's decision to make biometric Aadhaar authentication mandatory for domestic LPG consumers to book subsidised refills from 1 October. A bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Sanjay Sharma issued notice to the central government, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board and public sector oil companies, giving them two weeks to file a reply. The court listed the matter for hearing on 18 November.

The petition, filed by lawyer Pulkit Luthra who has 75 per cent permanent visual disability, argues that the mandate is arbitrary, disproportionate and violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. It claims that approximately 3.16 crore consumers are affected, particularly the elderly and persons with disabilities who may be unable to complete biometric authentication. Senior advocate Zoheb Hossain contended that the decision is contrary to existing law and the Supreme Court's Aadhaar judgment, and urged the court to consider interim relief.
Attorney General R Venkataramani defended the decision, stating it was taken to check the 'abuse' of government subsidy. He said the disabled section would be taken care of. The petition challenges a 17 September letter from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to oil marketing companies, followed by a 19 September press release, which contemplates blocking LPG refills for consumers who have not completed biometric authentication.
National Herald India and CNBC-TV18 both report the same hearing and quote the same submissions from the attorney-general and the petitioner's counsel. The coverage is uniform straight reporting of a court proceeding, with no discernible slant. The key difference is in the framing of the petition's detail: National Herald India leads with the attorney-general's statement that 'there is no data' and the government's abuse argument, while CNBC-TV18 leads with the petitioner's disability and the court's order. A balanced reading notes that both sides' positions are reported fully, but the government's defence is foregrounded in one outlet and the petitioner's difficulty in the other. The next hearing is on 18 November.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): nationalheraldindia.com (neutral report), cnbctv18.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.