
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday questioned Meta over the potential misuse of Instagram's 'remix' feature to violate copyright, while hearing a suit by educator Vikas Divyakirti seeking protection of his personality…
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday questioned Meta over the potential misuse of Instagram's 'remix' feature to violate copyright, while hearing a suit by educator Vikas Divyakirti seeking protection of his personality and copyright rights. Divyakirti, founder of Drishti IAS coaching centre, alleged that his lectures were selectively used to portray him as Hindu-phobic and anti-Brahmin, and his image was used in deepfake videos, including for a betting advertisement. Senior advocate Diya Kapur, appearing for Divyakirti, accused social media platforms of 'playing God' by suspending accounts based on arbitrary decisions without verifying copyright complaints.

Meta's advocate Varun Pathak argued that expecting constant monitoring by intermediaries was not feasible, and said remedies under the IT Act were available. The court observed that copyright strikes often have unfair consequences, with fake strikes succeeding immediately while the affected party faces a lengthy restoration process. Separately, the National Human Rights Commission has issued notices to Meta India, the Ministry of Electronics and IT, and local authorities in Etah over videos featuring children from a coaching centre that contained anti-Modi slogans and references to 'vote chori'. The NHRC has asked for action taken reports within two weeks and directed the identification of adults involved in producing the videos.
The two stories appear to cover unrelated court matters, copyright protection for a creator on one hand, and child welfare concerns over political content on the other, but both place Meta's content moderation at the center. Barandbench.com reports the Delhi High Court's questioning of Meta's copyright strike process, with the judge noting that fake strikes succeed while genuine creators struggle to restore content. Businesstoday.in reports the NHRC's intervention over children featured in anti-Modi videos on Instagram, demanding explanations from Meta and the government. The first story foregrounds an individual creator's legal battle, the second emphasizes regulatory scrutiny of platform governance over minors. Both sources are neutral-report in framing, reporting court and commission actions without editorial slant. The key watch item will be whether the Copyright Act amendments or upcoming Digital India Act propose structural changes to platform accountability.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): barandbench.com (neutral report), businesstoday.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry.