Now Reading: Family separated under Aurangzeb reunites after over 350 years in UP
-
01
Family separated under Aurangzeb reunites after over 350 years in UP
Descendants of a family that went their separate ways during Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s rule reunited on Saturday, 3 October 2026, in Dehri village, Jaunpur district. Titled ‘Brahmin Kul Milan’, the gathering at the residence of Naushad Ahmad Dubey, state president of Vishal Bharat Sansthan, brought together Hindu Brahmin relatives from Kashi and Jaunpur.
Family accounts say Naushad’s ancestor Lal Bahadur Dubey lived in Rani Ki Sarai, Azamgarh, eight generations ago. During Aurangzeb’s reign he is believed to have converted to Islam, settled in Dehri and became a zamindar. Over generations the families lost touch. The connection resurfaced when Naushad used the surname ‘Dubey’ on his daughter’s wedding card, prompting relatives to trace their roots. Rajiv Sriguruji, national president of Vishal Bharat Sansthan and a historian, led a four-year research effort to identify ancestral links.
The reunion featured a traditional ‘Bhoj-Bhat’ feast. Relatives embraced afterwards and pledged not to separate again. Senior RSS pracharak Vijay Sharma attended, inaugurated a gaushala named after Naushad’s gotra, and visited Lal Bahadur Dubey Marg. The New Indian Express reports the event while the Times of India adds that Sharma was invited by Naushad and describes the gathering as a message of unity against religious divisions.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Both The New Indian Express and the Times of India report the same event with near-identical facts: a family separated during Aurangzeb’s rule reuniting in Jaunpur after 350 years, Naushad Ahmad Dubey’s role, and the four-year research effort by historian Rajiv Sriguruji. The coverage is uniform straight reporting with no discernible slant. The Times of India provides extra detail absent from The New Indian Express: the presence of senior RSS pracharak Vijay Sharma at the event, the inauguration of a gaushala, and the description of the gathering as a message of unity against religious divisions. Both outlets agree on the central narrative and report without editorialising, leaving the reunion to speak for itself.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): newindianexpress.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
