
An ETBrandEquity article by Tata Play CEO argues that Indian youth movements have often begun with student mobilisation before gaining wider political force. It cites the Quit India Movement, Gujarat’s Nav Nirman…
An ETBrandEquity article by Tata Play CEO argues that Indian youth movements have often begun with student mobilisation before gaining wider political force. It cites the Quit India Movement, Gujarat’s Nav Nirman Movement, the Bihar Movement, the Assam agitation, anti-Mandal protests, the Anna Hazare movement and anti-CAA protests as examples.

The article says public discussion now increasingly describes movements as “Gen Z protests”, shifting attention from their demands to assumptions about a generation’s identity and behaviour. Comparing Gen Z with a consumer brand such as Basmati rice, it argues that repeated actions create expectations around the label, which the generation must then meet. The author says the views are personal.
The easy story that Gen Z is either uniquely rebellious or merely a social-media brand misses the point. Young people can supply energy and reach, but a label cannot explain every protest or replace its specific demands. The article’s branding analogy is useful, though it risks treating a diverse generation like a packaged product. The real test is whether movements win durable support after the hashtag fades and their demands face public scrutiny.
Source: brandequity.economictimes.indiatimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.