
India's aircraft carrier programme faces a strategic dilemma between cost and capability as it eyes a third carrier by 2026. The existing INS Vikrant, which first saw dry dock in 1965, remains…
India's aircraft carrier programme faces a strategic dilemma between cost and capability as it eyes a third carrier by 2026. The existing INS Vikrant, which first saw dry dock in 1965, remains a symbol of naval reach. A carrier provides a mobile runway in international waters, launching aircraft without requiring foreign bases, and can withdraw quickly. However, critics question whether India can sustain the expense of additional carriers given competing defence priorities. NDTV reports that the debate pits naval ambition against fiscal reality, with the carrier's unique ability to project power both quietly and visibly at the heart of the argument.
The push for a third aircraft carrier, while popular among naval enthusiasts, ignores the hard numbers. Each carrier costs roughly Rs 35,000 crore and needs two escort frigates. The lazy narrative that a carrier is essential for great-power status skips over India's unmet needs in submarines and maritime patrol aircraft. The real test is not whether India can launch a carrier, but whether it can afford to operate one. Yet China already fields three. So the question becomes: can India afford not to have one?
Source: ndtv.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.