ITAT deletes tax additions in two property dispute rulings

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has deleted tax additions in two separate cases involving disputed property transactions, both rulings published by Livemint. In the first, the Mumbai ITAT set aside a Rs 25 lakh addition against flat buyer Shivaji Tukaram Pawale for assessment year 2017-18, ruling the tax department cannot rely on third-party statements without giving the taxpayer access to them and an opportunity to cross-examine. The department had alleged Pawale paid cash over the declared consideration based on statements from builder partners, which he denied.

ITAT deletes Rs 25 lakh tax addition over denied cross-examination chance

In the second case, the Ahmedabad ITAT deleted a Rs 3.41 crore capital gains addition against landowner Suraj Jayantilal Patel, where a sale deed for Rs 6.82 crore was executed using a forged power of attorney and signatures. A civil court had already declared the sale void. The tribunal held there was no evidence Patel received any money, and the pending appeal by buyers did not justify a protective addition. Both rulings underscore procedural requirements for the tax department when relying on third-party evidence.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Livemint reports both rulings as neutral straight reporting, focusing on the tribunal's reasoning and implications for taxpayers. The common thread is the ITAT insisting on basic procedural fairness: the tax department cannot make additions based on evidence the taxpayer never saw or could challenge. In the Mumbai case, the department relied on builder statements without allowing cross-examination. In the Ahmedabad case, it taxed a sale a civil court had declared void and never verified whether the alleged seller actually received money. The coverage does not take sides but highlights how the tribunals are enforcing evidentiary standards that protect individual taxpayers. Watch for whether the department appeals either ruling to the High Court.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): livemint.com (neutral report), livemint.com (2) (neutral report)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.