
Karnataka told the Supreme Court that rainfall enabled it to deliver 86,797 cusecs at Biligundlu between July 29 and August 10, against 45,500 cusecs directed by the Cauvery Water Management Authority. It…
Karnataka told the Supreme Court that rainfall enabled it to deliver 86,797 cusecs at Biligundlu between July 29 and August 10, against 45,500 cusecs directed by the Cauvery Water Management Authority. It said the releases complied with the order despite a distress year. Tamil Nadu rejected that account, saying the water flowed because reservoirs were near full and spilled, not through voluntary releases. It claimed a backlog of 21.357 TMC by August 12 and sought that amount, plus 37 TMC due from August 12 to August 31. The Hindu reports that the Authority had directed only 15.552 TMC for the 15-day period.
The lazy narrative is that either Karnataka is secretly diverting water or Tamil Nadu is simply demanding more than its share. The filings show a narrower dispute: whether measured flows count as compliance and how much water is actually due in a distress year. Political allegations, including claims of a secret KRS release reported by Deccan Chronicle, cannot replace reservoir data. The decisive test is the Central Water Commission’s Biligundlu measurements and the final TMC calculation.
Sources (2): thehindu.com, deccanchronicle.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.