Now Reading: Mumbai court rejects bail for 81-year-old CA in Rs 200 crore remittance case
-
01
Mumbai court rejects bail for 81-year-old CA in Rs 200 crore remittance case
Mumbai court rejects bail for 81-year-old CA in Rs 200 crore remittance case
The Story in Brief
A special court in Mumbai on Saturday, 7 November 2026, rejected the anticipatory bail plea of 81-year-old chartered accountant Seetaram Bhat, who is being investigated for alleged illegal foreign remittances of over Rs 200 crore through bogus tax certificates. The Economic Offences Wing is probing allegations that chartered accountants and company directors colluded to set up shell companies between 2021-22 and 2024-25.
Bhat is accused of issuing 163 Form 15CB certificates for eight companies, involving Rs 200.58 crore. The Times of India reports that the court observed Bhat had not properly examined account books or agreements before issuing the certificates, and that his police complaint over misuse of his digital signature was filed after the offence was registered, calling it an ‘after thought’.
Free Press Journal adds that Bhat argued he was 82, had practised for over five decades, and that staff at his Mumbai office misused his digital signature. The court held that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the fraud and that granting pre-arrest bail could hamper the investigation.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Both outlets report the same court order, but the Times of India leads with Bhat’s age and the specific count of 163 certificates, while Free Press Journal opens with the Rs 2,575.83 crore total fraud figure. The court’s finding that Bhat’s complaint was an ‘after thought’ appears in both reports verbatim, indicating uniform coverage of the key judicial observation. Free Press Journal adds detail on the Sept 4 complaint by the Income Tax authority that triggered the case, which the Times of India omits. The coverage is straight reporting with no discernible slant from either outlet. The case now proceeds to further investigation by the EOW.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), freepressjournal.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
