
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that a subsequent acquittal in a criminal case cannot reopen or invalidate departmental proceedings that have already attained finality. Justice Namit Kumar held that the departmental punishment was imposed before the acquittal, so Rule 16.3(1) of the Punjab Police Rules did not apply.

The case involved a police constable dismissed for negligence in a passport verification for an alleged gangster who later fled to Canada. The constable was acquitted in the criminal case in April 2024, but the court said the disciplinary process was independent and had concluded earlier. The petition was dismissed for lacking merit and for concealing that other accused were also punished.
LiveLaw reports the judgment in detail. LiveMint covers a different case: the same court set aside a 2021 Chandigarh Police promotion amendment, ruling the Home Department lacked jurisdiction under the 2007 Act, though it protected 42 constables who had cleared the B-1 test.
The two sources report completely unrelated judgments from the same court, so no cross-outlet framing comparison is possible. LiveLaw's coverage is a detailed neutral-report of a service law ruling reaffirming that criminal acquittals do not automatically nullify departmental punishment. LiveMint's report is a neutral-report on a separate administrative law ruling about invalid promotion rules. Both are straight, non-ideological reporting. The key takeaway is procedural: courts will enforce the independence of disciplinary proceedings from criminal outcomes, and any rule change must follow the correct parent statute. Watch for the Chandigarh Administration's next move on promotions or reversions.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): livelaw.in (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.