RTI data shows 10 hit by pellets in July 20 Parliament march

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance3 minutes ago1 Views

At least 10 people injured by pellets on July 20, shows RTI response

At least 10 people were injured by pellets during the July 20 march to Parliament, according to Right to Information responses from two Delhi hospitals accessed by Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale.…

The Story in Brief

At least 10 people were injured by pellets during the July 20 march to Parliament, according to Right to Information responses from two Delhi hospitals accessed by Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale. Lady Hardinge Medical College reported nine pellet injuries, and Safdarjung Hospital reported one. The Delhi Police had earlier denied using pellet guns.

RTI data shows 10 hit by pellets in July 20 Parliament march

The RTI data contradicts earlier reports of five pellet injuries, Gokhale said. Records are still awaited from AIIMS and RML Hospital. Separately, a general diary entry from Parliament Street police station shows the Rapid Action Force fired two rounds from an anti-riot gun on a deputy commissioner's orders.

RTI data shows 10 hit by pellets in July 20 Parliament march

The Indian Opinion

The hospital count of 10 pellet injuries is probably not final, with AIIMS and RML records still pending. Both the police denial and the government's claim of utmost restraint look shaky next to the RAF's own diary entry and its inspector general's admission of serious deficiencies. The bigger test is whether the government releases a full, verified victim count and explains why an anti-riot gun was needed for a student march. Will the home minister answer for the RAF's own review? That answer will settle more than this incident.


Sources (3): thehindu.com, thehindu.com (2), thehindu.com (3)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 3 sources linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Previous Post

Next Post

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.