
Sri Lanka's cabinet decided on August 10 to let refugees who fled during the civil war return even if they left without a valid passport or through an unauthorised port. However, returnees…
Sri Lanka's cabinet decided on August 10 to let refugees who fled during the civil war return even if they left without a valid passport or through an unauthorised port. However, returnees must now obtain a security clearance from the State Intelligence Service (SIS), a condition that activists call regressive. The decision follows the May 2025 arrest of a 75-year-old refugee returning from India, which caused a furore and led the UNHCR to pause its repatriation work.

Around 80,000 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees live in Tamil Nadu, many born in India. Minister Bimal Rathnayake said Sri Lanka is ready to receive them and urged Indian leaders not to use refugees for political propaganda. Refugee groups like OfERR warn that SIS vetting, an agency accused of wartime abuses, could deter returns and treat all returnees as suspects.
Both sides are spinning this decision. The Sri Lankan government calls it a humanitarian move to let war-displaced Tamils come home; activists call it a fresh security trap. In truth, waiving the penalty for illegal departure is a real step forward, but grafting an intelligence clearance onto it, for people who fled decades ago, sends a contradictory signal. The test will come with the first few returnees: will clearance be swift and routine, or will it become a permanent barrier? And what counts as an 'other serious offence'?
Sources (2): thehindu.com, thefederal.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.