Supreme Court cancels bail in fake Chinese investment app case

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance15 minutes ago1 Views

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cancelled the bail granted to Bhupesh Arora and rejected the bail plea of Rohit Vij in a money laundering case linked to the alleged fake Chinese investment…

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cancelled the bail granted to Bhupesh Arora and rejected the bail plea of Rohit Vij in a money laundering case linked to the alleged fake Chinese investment app LOXAM. A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale ruled that a settlement in the predicate offence does not automatically end the criminal activity or the Enforcement Directorate's investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Supreme Court cancels bail in fake Chinese investment app case

The case originates from a July 2022 Hyderabad cyber crime FIR, where a complainant alleged he was cheated of Rs 1.16 lakh through the LOXAM app, which promised high returns. The ED alleged that funds from victims were routed through accounts linked to Xindai Technologies Pvt. Ltd., then converted into cash and foreign currency through Ranjan Moneycorp and KDS Forex, entities allegedly controlled by Vij and Navneet Kaushik.

The Delhi High Court had granted Arora bail in February, citing prima facie gaps and the quashing of the predicate FIR following a compromise. It refused Vij bail in August, citing his alleged role in the cash conversion mechanism. The Supreme Court set aside Arora's bail and dismissed Vij's plea, hearing ED's challenge against Arora's bail and Vij's plea against the refusal of his bail together.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both sources provide straight factual reporting of the Supreme Court's order, with no discernible slant. Indiatvnews.com leads with the headline's outcome and includes the court's legal principle prominently. Barandbench.com adds procedural detail, including the Delhi High Court's differing reasoning for Arora and Vij. The uniform coverage reflects the clear judicial ruling. The legal implication is that compromise in a predicate offence does not automatically shut down a PMLA investigation, a principle that may affect future money laundering cases where underlying offences are settled. The Supreme Court's final order stands as the concrete outcome.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): indiatvnews.com (neutral report), barandbench.com (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.