
The Supreme Court on Wednesday, 4 November directed the Madhya Pradesh Assembly Speaker to decide within two months a disqualification petition against Congress MLA Nirmala Sapre under the anti-defection law, ruling that high courts must not defer such matters because the assembly has substantial tenure remaining.

A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana heard a petition by Leader of the Opposition Umang Singhar, who alleged Sapre voluntarily gave up her Congress membership after being elected on its ticket in the 2023 polls and aligned with the BJP without resigning. The petition has been pending before the speaker since June 2024. The Madhya Pradesh High Court in June 2026 declined to expedite it, citing no urgency and two years of the assembly's term remaining.
Disagreeing, the Supreme Court said issues under the Tenth Schedule must be dealt with promptly, citing its earlier judgments. The bench initially proposed three months but reduced it to two after senior advocate Vivek Tankha's request. Sapre denies leaving the Congress or formally joining the BJP. The Speaker must now rule within two months.
The Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant set a two-month deadline for the Madhya Pradesh Assembly Speaker to decide the disqualification petition against MLA Nirmala Sapre, rejecting the High Court’s view that the assembly’s remaining tenure justified delay. Both Hindustan Times and India Today report the same core ruling and legal reasoning from the bench, drawing on identical PTI copy. Hindustan Times provides greater procedural detail, including the bench’s initial proposal of a three-month deadline and Vivek Tankha’s request for two months, as well as the High Court’s June 2026 order. India Today adds Tankha’s characterisation of the case as a ‘death knell of the Tenth Schedule’. The coverage is otherwise uniform straight reporting, the key material fact remains the two-month deadline for the Speaker, set in the Supreme Court’s order on 4 November 2026.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): hindustantimes.com (neutral report), indiatoday.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.