Supreme Court reconstitutes bench for PMLA verdict review

The Supreme Court has reconstituted the bench to hear pending review petitions against its landmark 2022 verdict on the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. A new three-judge bench led by Chief Justice…

The Supreme Court has reconstituted the bench to hear pending review petitions against its landmark 2022 verdict on the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. A new three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, will take up the matter. Indiatvnews.com and Indiatoday.in both report that the earlier bench, which included Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh, was changed after the CJI noted that continuing with it would require reconstituting three existing benches. All parties consented to the new bench.

Supreme Court reconstitutes bench for PMLA verdict review

The review petitions challenge two key aspects of the July 27, 2022 judgment. The first is whether an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) must be supplied to the accused. The second is Section 24 of the PMLA, which places the burden of proof on the accused. The court has confined the review to these limited questions.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both sources report the bench reconstitution with matching detail, showing no discernible slant. Indiatoday.in adds procedural context, noting the CJI's reason for the change and the two specific legal questions under review. Indiatvnews.com is briefer but consistent. The coverage is uniform straight reporting. For careful readers, the real story is the narrow scope of the review: the court will not revisit the entire 2022 judgment, only the ECIR-sharing and burden-of-proof issues, meaning the ED's core powers remain untouched unless the review succeeds. The next hearing date will be the concrete thing to watch.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): indiatvnews.com (neutral report), indiatoday.in (neutral report)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.