Now Reading: Supreme Court to rule on 3-year practice rule for judges tomorrow
-
01
Supreme Court to rule on 3-year practice rule for judges tomorrow
The Supreme Court will pronounce on Friday its verdict on review petitions challenging the mandatory three-year legal practice rule for candidates seeking direct recruitment as Civil Judges (Junior Division). A bench of…
The Supreme Court will pronounce on Friday its verdict on review petitions challenging the mandatory three-year legal practice rule for candidates seeking direct recruitment as Civil Judges (Junior Division). A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice August George Masih and Justice K Vinod Chandran reserved judgment on July 28 after hearing submissions from counsels, intervenors and the amicus curiae. Justice Chandran will deliver the judgment.
The review petitions seek to overturn the court’s May 2025 decision restoring the three-year requirement. Opponents argued it discourages meritorious graduates, especially women and persons with disabilities. Senior advocates Pinky Anand and Colin Gonsalves said judicial training after recruitment should replace the practice mandate. The court also heard a writ for relaxation of the rule for disabled candidates. Some High Courts and law universities have backed relaxing the rule for specially abled candidates.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Both livelaw.in articles report the same event identically, the Supreme Court’s scheduled verdict on review petitions against the three-year practice rule for judicial service. The coverage is uniform neutral-report, with no pro-government, critical, or ideological slant in either source. The text leads with the court’s announcement and includes counsels’ arguments without endorsing any side. The measured takeaway for a careful reader: the key question is whether the court will relax the rule for women and disabled candidates, as some High Courts and law universities have urged. The verdict, to be pronounced by Justice Chandran, will settle whether the 2025 mandate stands or is modified. Watch the court’s classification: any carve-out could set a precedent for category-based relaxations nationwide.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): livelaw.in (neutral report), livelaw.in (2) (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.
