SC seeks Centre’s reply on plea for criminal action against platforms showing child sex abuse ads

Plea in Supreme Court seeks criminal action against social media platforms failing to report child porn

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Centre's response to a plea seeking prosecution of social media platforms that fail to report child sexual exploitation and abuse material (CSEAM) to police, as…

The Story in Brief

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Centre's response to a plea seeking prosecution of social media platforms that fail to report child sexual exploitation and abuse material (CSEAM) to police, as mandated by the POCSO Act. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and Vinod Chandran issued notice to the Union government through MeitY and the law ministry. The court also asked the petitioner, Just Rights for Children Alliance (JRCA), to implead intermediaries to ensure compliance with its 2024 judgment.

SC seeks Centre's reply on plea for criminal action against platforms showing child sex abuse ads

The plea, filed by JRCA, follows a BBC report alleging that paid advertisements promoting CSEAM appeared on Instagram and redirected users to Telegram. It argues that Meta reports such instances to the US-based NCMEC but does not indicate whether it also reports to Indian police as required. The plea seeks a uniform SOP for intermediaries covering detection, mandatory reporting, preservation of evidence and coordination, and criminal action against non-compliant platforms.

The Indian Opinion

The BBC's report rightly triggered alarm, but the real test is whether Indian law is enforced. Meta reports to an American agency, yet the POCSO Act demands reporting to local police. The Supreme Court's 2024 judgment already settled the legal duty. The Centre now must show it can move beyond issuing notices to Meta. Watch for the SOP the plea demands: a concrete document with timelines and penalties will reveal if this is action or theatre. Will the government name a single platform it has penalised for non-compliance? That number will be the proof.


Sources (2): barandbench.com, timesofindia.indiatimes.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.