
The Bombay High Court on Thursday convicted former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal of sexually assaulting a colleague in 2013, overturning a trial court order that had acquitted him. The HC criticised the…
The Bombay High Court on Thursday convicted former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal of sexually assaulting a colleague in 2013, overturning a trial court order that had acquitted him. The HC criticised the earlier verdict for shaming the survivor and violating legal rules against raising her character as evidence.
The High Court pointed to CCTV footage and apology letters from Tejpal as proof of his guilt. It also rejected the 'ideal victim' notion, saying survivors react differently to assault. Tejpal has claimed he is a political victim.
The trial court's 527-page order read like a defence brief, not a judgment. Judges who allow a survivor's chat history to be weaponised and her composure to be held against her are part of the problem. The HC has corrected this case, but the lesson is for every court. Watch how lower courts handle evidence of a survivor's sexual history in future trials. That will tell us if this verdict changes anything.
Source: newindianexpress.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.