Centre appoints judges to four high courts

Centre Notifies Appointment Of Judges For High Courts At Madras, Karnataka, Calcutta and Madhya Pradesh

The Union government on Friday notified the appointment of 15 judges and additional judges to the Madras High Court, nine additional judges to the Calcutta High Court, six additional judges to the…

The Story in Brief

The Union government on Friday notified the appointment of 15 judges and additional judges to the Madras High Court, nine additional judges to the Calcutta High Court, six additional judges to the Karnataka High Court, and one additional judge to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal announced the appointments on X, stating they were made on the recommendation of the Supreme Court Collegium. The Calcutta appointments follow meetings held on May 11 and 12, while the Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh appointments were recommended on June 2.

Centre appoints 39 judges to Madras, Calcutta, Karnataka, MP High Courts

For the Madras High Court, five advocates were appointed as judges and ten others, three advocates and seven judicial officers, as additional judges. The Calcutta High Court now has nine additional judges, including Indranil Roy, Aryak Dutt, Atarup Banerjee, Sandip Kumar De, Partha Pratim Roy, Sudip Deb, Anuj Singh, Arjun Ray Mukherjee, and Rishad Medora. The Karnataka High Court's working strength rises to 54 judges against a sanctioned 62. The Madhya Pradesh High Court's working strength stands at 40 judges against a sanctioned 53.

The Indian Opinion

The recent judicial appointments, covering four high courts, have been framed in some quarters as a fillip to judicial infrastructure. But the real story is about numbers that still lag. The Karnataka High Court, for instance, will now have 54 judges against a sanctioned strength of 62. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has 40 judges against a sanctioned 53. The question is not whether these additions are welcome, they are. The question is whether the pace of appointment will ever close the gap, or will it remain a perennial deficit dressed up as a milestone.


Sources (4): livelaw.in, livelaw.in (2), barandbench.com, barandbench.com (2)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.