
Doctors told Times Now News that routine X-rays use very low radiation doses and do not make patients radioactive. The radiation does not remain in the body, and the benefits of diagnosing…
Doctors told Times Now News that routine X-rays use very low radiation doses and do not make patients radioactive. The radiation does not remain in the body, and the benefits of diagnosing fractures, infections and lung disease usually outweigh the small risk.
Patients should ask why an X-ray is needed, what it may show and whether it will affect treatment. Pregnant women, or those who may be pregnant, must inform their healthcare provider. Children and pregnant women may receive extra precautions, with ultrasound or MRI considered where suitable. Unnecessary repeat scans should be avoided because radiation exposure accumulates over a lifetime. One radiologist cited by the outlet said a chest X-ray involves about 0.1 mSv, roughly 10 days of natural background radiation.
Claims that every X-ray causes cancer, infertility or lasting contamination are alarmist. So is the opposite idea that repeated scans never matter. The practical answer is simple: a medically justified scan should not be delayed, while patients can ask whether an existing image or a non-ionising test would do. For children and pregnant women, the record of prior imaging and the reason for repeating it deserve particular scrutiny. The key test is whether each scan changes diagnosis or treatment.
Source: timesnownews.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.