
The Finance Ministry introduced the Bankers’ Books Evidence Bill, 2026, in Parliament on July 28. It seeks to repeal and replace the 1891 law, recognising bank records stored electronically, digitally, offsite or…
The Finance Ministry introduced the Bankers’ Books Evidence Bill, 2026, in Parliament on July 28. It seeks to repeal and replace the 1891 law, recognising bank records stored electronically, digitally, offsite or in the cloud, including backup and disaster recovery locations. The bill would allow such records to be admitted as evidence in court, subject to safeguards on security, accuracy, authorised access and data transfer.
The proposed law retains a provision allowing a police officer of at least Superintendent rank to compel banks to provide records during certain criminal investigations without prior judicial approval. Medianama reports that this gives such police orders the same legal effect as court orders for producing, inspecting or copying bank records. The bill would also treat interconnected computer systems as one system for evidentiary purposes.
The loudest claims will likely present the bill either as a digital reform with no downside or as a blank cheque for police access. Neither is supported by the text. Cloud records need clear standards, but allowing senior police officers to seek bank data without a judge’s prior approval remains a real oversight concern. The practical test is simple: will future rules require a traceable record of every request, its purpose and its outcome?],
Source: medianama.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.