
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a government employee cannot claim a right to continue occupying an official quarter when the government has decided to demolish the premises for redevelopment in…
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a government employee cannot claim a right to continue occupying an official quarter when the government has decided to demolish the premises for redevelopment in the larger public interest. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair dismissed a petition by Mary Megu, a staff artist in the Arunachal Pradesh Art and Culture Department, who was allotted a quarter in Naharlagun in 1998 and asked to vacate it in 2026.

The court noted the state's policy decision to dismantle old quarters at D-Sector, Naharlagun and construct a multi-storied building to house more employees who lack government accommodation. The petitioner was given options of alternative temporary accommodation or house rent allowance until the new flats are built, and would get priority allotment in the new building. The court held that the policy decision was taken in public interest and no prejudice was caused to the petitioner.
This ruling reinforces the principle that government accommodation is a facility tied to public policy, not a permanent entitlement. Under the Arunachal Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 2003, an estate officer can evict occupants for redevelopment projects. The case highlights a common tension in states with limited housing stock: older employees resist relocation while the government aims to maximise space for a larger workforce. The next step will be the eviction order's execution, and similar petitions may arise as other employees in the same sector face notices.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.